Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Hum Reprod ; 37(3): 534-541, 2022 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1788499

ABSTRACT

STUDY QUESTION: Does the administration of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccine have an association with ovarian reserve as expressed by circulating anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels? SUMMARY ANSWER: Ovarian reserve as assessed by serum AMH levels is not altered at 3 months following mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: A possible impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination through an interaction between the oocyte and the somatic cells could not be ruled out, however, data are limited. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a prospective study conducted at a university affiliated tertiary medical center between February and March 2021. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Study population included reproductive aged women (18-42 years) that were vaccinated by two Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccines (21 days apart). Women with ovarian failure, under fertility treatments, during pregnancy, previous Covid-19 infection or vaccinated were excluded from the study. Blood samples were collected for AMH levels before the first mRNA vaccine administration. Additional blood samples after 3 months were collected for AMH and anti-Covid-19 antibody levels. Primary outcome was defined as the absolute and percentage change in AMH levels. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The study group consisted of 129 women who received two mRNA vaccinations. Mean AMH levels were 5.3 (±SD 4.29) µg/l and 5.3 (±SD 4.50) µg/l at baseline and after 3 months, respectively (P = 0.11). To account for possible age-specific changes of AMH, sub-analyses were performed for three age groups: <30, 30-35 and >35 years. AMH levels were significantly lower for women older than 35 years at all times (P = 0.001 for pre and post vaccination AMH levels versus younger women). However, no significant differences for the changes in AMH levels before and after vaccinations (Delta AMH) were observed for the three age groups (P = 0.46). Additionally, after controlling for age, no association was found between the degree of immunity response and AMH levels. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although it was prospectively designed, for ethical reasons we could not assign a priori a randomized unvaccinated control group. This study examined plasma AMH levels at 3 months after the first vaccination. It could be argued that possible deleterious ovarian and AMH changes caused by the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations might take effect only at a later time. Only longer-term studies will be able to examine this issue. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The results of the study provide reassurance for women hesitant to complete vaccination against Covid 19 due to concerns regarding its effect on future fertility. This information could be of significant value to physicians and patients alike. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study was supported by Sheba Medical Center institutional sources. All authors have nothing to disclose. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study protocol was approved by the 'Sheba Medical Center' Ethical Committee Review Board (ID 8121-21-SMC) on 8 February 2021 and was registered at the National Institutes of Health (NCT04748172).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Adult , Anti-Mullerian Hormone , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccines, Synthetic , mRNA Vaccines
2.
Reproductive Sciences ; 29(SUPPL 1):43-44, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1749618
3.
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology ; 28(11, Supplement):S127-S128, 2021.
Article in English | ScienceDirect | ID: covidwho-1466642

ABSTRACT

Study Objective To study the collateral effect of the actions taken to limit the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic by comparing the characteristics and outcomes of women who underwent laparoscopy for suspected adnexal torsion (AT) during the pandemic to pre-pandemic periods. Design A retrospective cohort study. Setting A tertiary, university affiliated medical center. Patients or Participants We included all women who underwent laparoscopy for suspected AT between March 2011 and February 2021. We compared the COVID-19 pandemic period, beginning at the first lockdown in Israel (March 15 2020, to February 8 2021, group 1) to a parallel period in 2019-2020 (group 2) and to a nine years period preceding the pandemic, between 3/2011-2/2020 (group 3). Interventions Diagnostic and operative laparoscopy. Measurements and Main Results Ninety-seven laparoscopies were performed in group 1, 82 in group 2, and 635 in group 3. Groups 1 and 2 were comparable in age, obstetrical history, sonographic characteristics of adnexa and clinical presentation. The rate of women presenting following IVF treatment was lower in group 1 [OR 95% CI 0.22 (0.06-0.86), p<0.023]. Time from admission to decision to operate was shorter in group 1 (162 vs. 232 minutes, p=0.028). In the comparison between groups 1 and 3, baseline characteristics were comparable. The rate of women presenting following IVF treatments was lower [OR 95% CI 0.15 (0.04-0.49), p<0.001], the time from admission to surgery was shorter (544 vs. 748 minutes, p=0.005), and the rate of surgically confirmed AT was lower [59 (60.8%) vs. 455 (71.7%), p=0.030, OR (95% CI) 0.61 (0.39-0.95)] in group 1. Conclusion Our data underline differences in the time from admission to surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic, and in the rate of women presenting with suspected AT following IVF treatments. These findings may reflect a change in medical resources during the pandemic.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL